Lies? Fakery? Spin? That’s The Clinton Foundation per emails

clinton-foundatin-only-5Only 5% of The Clinton Foundation money actually goes towards charitable work.

But the Foundation “spins’ the story differently.  Below is an email from WikiLeaks  first drafted by Bill Clinton and then changed by John Podesta.

The Foundation does NOT improve the lives of millions of people.  The Foundation enriches the Clintons  — Hilary, Bill and daughter.

From WikiLeaks — written by Bill Clinton and changed by John Podesa:

“Like other global charities, the Clinton Foundation receives support from individuals, organizations and governments from all over the world. Contributions are made because of a strong belief that the Foundation’s programs improve the lives of millions of people around the globe, whether through strengthening health systems, increasing access to lifesaving medicines, helping communities confront the effects of climate change, creating economic opportunity and reducing childhood obesity and other preventable diseases. The Clinton Foundation has a record of integrity and transparency that goes above what is required of U.S. charities and beyond the practices of most peer organizations. This includes the voluntary disclosure of contributions on the Foundation’s website. Should Secretary Clinton decide to run for office, we will continue to ensure the Foundation’s policies and practices regarding support from international partners is appropriate, just as we did when she served as Secretary of State.”

Share

The Clinton Foundation: an In-N-Out Burger that tastes — terrible?

in-and-out-burger-two-meatsIn-N-Out Burgers produces quality hamburgers which taste great at a reasonable cost.  What about The Clinton Foundation?

Think of  The Clinton Foundation akin to an In-n-Out Burger.   The Clinton Foundation rakes in millions of dollars and has lots of hype and publicity attached to it’s “good works”.   But, how does it “taste

Does The Clinton Foundation produce a  quality product at a reasonable cost?  You decide. Here’s a real example that involved The Clinton Foundation, young women and money for leadership.

Clinton's In and Out Berger
Clinton’s In and Out Berger

What if your college daughter won a $25K  prize for women leadership?  Wow!

But what if it cost $26 K for your daughter  to get the money?      That’s a wash, right?   Perhaps good publicity but no money received  to develop her leadership skills.

That’s the way the Clinton Foundation works.  Lots of money comes  in.   And lots of hype about the ‘good works’ they do.   But only peanuts  goes out for real charity. Roughly 5% of the Clinton Foundation money goes for real charity.

Call it what you want  — The Clinton Foundation is not a  real charity.  Very few people are helped.

Bill Clinton received a prize.  He went to the college to receive the prize.  Instead of accepting the prize money Bill Clinton said,

‘ Naw,  you keep the money and start a program in women leadership ‘.  That’s what  Clinton said after receiving $25  K prize money  for the Dole Leadership Prize.

So the college kept the money. But   — the hooker — Clinton billed the college $26 K for travel expenses.   Overall results?  The college did not really “make” any money to use for women leadership.  The Clinton’s made a thousand dollars  and got lots of  good publicity out of the event.

 

Clinton's In and Out Berger
Clinton’s In-N-Out Burger gives low quality

Those Clinton’s know how to make and keep money.  Wow!

Are the Clinton hustlers? You decide.

Since 2014,,  Hilary and Bill  routinely charge $200 – 500 K a speech at many  college campuses.

At Penn State University, the cost to  attend a special  college function with Clinton’s daughter was  $2,700, $1,000 for a photo and $500 for a “conversation”.  Whew.

Lots of money comes in  to the Clinton’s.  Not much money goes out for charity.

And — concerning the Dole Leadership Prize —  The Clinton Foundation donated no real money to develop college women leadership abilities.  In fact, the Clinton’s made money and got good publicity.  So how does this “taste”?

_______________________

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/9/hillary-clinton-campaign-demanded-500-from-college/

The Wall Street Journal, ‘Free’ Clinton Talks Came at a Big Cost, by James Grimaldi, Friday, Oct. 28, 2016

written by Cameron Jackson, Ph.D.

Monerey Bay Forum

127 Jewell Street
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
United States (US)
Phone: 831 688 6002
Fax: 831 688 7717
Email: jaj48@aol.com

 

 

Share

Actions speak louder than words – Trump versus Hilary

 

Trump and Hilary
Trump and Hilary: crude talk versus enabler

Actions speak louder than words. Compare Hilary and Trump.  Choose between   crude male talk 11 years ago  or a  female enabler so that her  husband   sexually assaults women?

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/07/bills-sex-accusers-echo-trump-hillary-enabler/

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/435941/hillary-clinton-enabled-bill-clintons-abuse-women-her-own-standards

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch_oct13

_______________

Monterey Bay Forum:   A pattern of actions over many years shows a person’s character.  There are many reasons why so many  Americans overwhelmingly do not trust Hilary.

Actions speak louder than words
Actions speak louder than words
Share