Privacy matter to you too? Tucker Carlson moves to Florida

 

 

 

 

 

Tucker Carlson  moves from Washington D.C.  to a barrier  island in  Florida.  Privacy considerations?   Harassment by the New York Times?  Protect privacy of his family?

Fox News political commentator Tucker Carlson  sold his home in Washington, D.C.’s leafy and affluent Kent neighborhood for $3.95 million after he bought  a $2.9 million home hidden down a private lane amid  tropical foliage on a tiny barrier island off Florida’s Gulf Coast.

Recently back from vacation, on 7/20/2020 Carlson said on his show:   “How would Murray Carpenter and his photographer, Tristan Spinski, feel if we told you where they live, if we put pictures of their homes on the air?” Carlson asked. “What if we published the home address of every one of the soulless, robot editors at the New York Times, who assigned and managed this incitement of violence against my family?”

He added: “We could do that. We know who they are.”

Despite the Times’s denial that an upcoming story would publish Carlson’s residence, his accusation sparked fierce backlash from a number of prominent conservatives, including at least one GOP lawmaker.

“There is absolutely no reason for the NY Times to do this, unless of course it is to intimidate Tucker Carlson — or anyone who has views like him,” tweeted Rep. Eric A. “Rick” Crawford (R-Ark.), sharing a video of the host talking. “This isn’t ‘reporting’ and should be condemned by any news entity who has any credibility left.”

Acting deputy secretary of homeland security Ken Cuccinelli retweeted criticism that the Times is promoting violence against Carlson, adding “That is clearly their intent.

____

Aptos Psychologist:  Let the New York Times know what you think about publicizing the home addresses of persons who disagree with your opinions.   Freedom of speech and privacy for persons in their homes is worth speaking up for.  Right?

 

Share

Release YOUR home address? New York Times publicizes conservative’s address

 

 

 

The New York Times plans this week  to   releases information the  home  address  of conservative TV talk host Tucker Carlson, a talk show host that criticizes what the Times publishes.

Why?  So  Carlson  will be harassed at his home  and stop saying what he says about the New York Times.

What does Carlson say about the New York Times?For example, Tucker has criticized the New York Times for publicizing  their Project that America’s birthday was not 1776 but rather when the first slaves were brought to America.  America was founded for slavery and to perpetuate white supremacy — those are the kinds of opinions which the New York Times publicizes.   Tucker Carlson calls these opinions into question and the Times does not like disagreement.

We probably all know people who, because of their work, do not make their home address readily available.   Privacy for family and your home is a place of safety and security are important values to safeguard.

It’s time to tell the New York Times to CHANGE their WAYS.  Right?   Do so!

It’s time to tell the New York Times to “kill” their story on Tucker Carlson — which lists his home address.

The NYT could care less about privacy for Carlson and his family.   We do.  So do you?

Time to tell the New York Times to change their ways.   Right?    DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

Share

Pipeline cleanup: will New York Times, CNN etc. report story?

 BY RICK MORAN FEBRUARY 5, 2017

“A cleanup to prevent an “environmental disaster” is underway at a protest camp near the Dakota Access Pipeline.

The  Pipleine camp had been occupied by thousands of environmentalists and Native Americans who were demonstrating against the pipeline project.

It was the Native Americans who requested help with the Pipeline cleanup.  Massive amounts of garbage, human waste, teepees, and abandoned vehicles must be removed before the spring thaw when flooding is expected.

Washington Times:

Clean-up crews are racing to clear acres of debris at the largest Dakota Access protest camp before the spring thaw turns the snowy, trash-covered plains into an environmental disaster area.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced Friday that the camp, located on federal land, would be closed Feb. 22 in order to “prevent injuries and significant environmental damage in the likely event of flooding in this area” at the mouth of the Cannonball River in North Dakota.

“Without proper remediation, debris, trash, and untreated waste will wash into the Cannonball River and Lake Oahe,” the Corps said in its statement.

Those involved in the clean-up effort, led by the Standing Rock Sioux, say it could take weeks for private sanitation companies and volunteers to clear the expanse of abandoned tents, tepees,sleeping bags

—————————————————-

Firenze Sage:   These morons couldn’t even dig a latrine. Imagine walking around in a kennel.

Share

System rigged: Democrats disguised as journalists aid Clintons

Donna Brazille of CNN fired for giving Hilary questions ahead of time
Donna Brazille of CNN fired for giving Hilary questions ahead of time

Caught giving questions
New York Times Democratic operative

How the mainsteam media rigs 2016 elections:  This must stop!

Hilary Clinton   given the questions ahead of time by Democratic operatives disguised as journalists. That happened with Donna Brazille.  The mainstream press also protected Bill Clinton.

 Here’s the questions Mr. President  I’m going to ask you…

The New York Times provided questions to former President Bill Clinton before an interview with Nicholas Kristoff, the Wikileaks release of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta emails has revealed.

In an email sent to Podesta and several others, the Clinton Foundation’s Director of Foreign Policy Ami Desai requests feedback on answers to “questions they sent that are related to international issues”:

[A]s you may know, WJC is doing Q+A with Nick Kristof on Wednesday (at the Foursquare Conference). It’s supposed to be closed press, but. Below are the questions they sent that are related to international issues – namely Israelis/Palestinians, China (trade/Tibet/Taiwan), and Greece/Euro. Are there any WJC Admin accomplishments that we should equip him to be able to highlight? [I put some initial ideas in CAPS below; and we also have requested input from the State Department.] We’d welcome any feedback by Sunday. Thanks, Ami

Current columns by Kristof:   A quick review of recent columns by Kristof reveals a lot of Clinton water-carrying with headlines like “Donald Trump, Groper in Chief” and “How to Cover a Charlatan Like Trump” and “When a Crackpot Run For President” where he makes the case that “journalistic efforts at fairness may risk normalizing Donald Trump.”

In the email, Desai reveals four questions on international issues that Kristof planned to ask Clinton. The first question is framed by crediting Clinton with coming within a “whisker from a Middle East peace deal.” Three of the questions are followed by proposed answers in all CAPS from the Clinton Foundation.

https://www.google.com/search?q=kristoff+and+clinton+interview+images&safe=active&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj_pbe3vdbPAhUms1QKHUZrBiMQ7AkIOA&biw=1126&bih=694#imgrc=wYvCCgCZe6B5uM%3A

______________________

Firneze Sage:  The so called press is plain dishonest. Shun them!

New York Times gives Clinton questions
New York Times caught  giving  Clinton questions
NBC
NBC
Share

Why illegally publish Trump’s tax returns?

 

Trump
Trump signs his tax return

Why  illegally publish Trump’s tax returns from 1995?

The New York Times executive editor said during a visit to Harvard in September that he would risk jail to publish Donald Trump’s tax returns. He made good on his word Saturday night when the Times published Trump tax documents from 1995, which show the Republican presidential nominee claimed losses of $916 million that year — enough to avoid paying federal income taxes for as many as 18 years.

Federal law makes it illegal to publish an unauthorized tax return or “return information”:

It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information. Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

Back in 1995, New  York Times called Trump a genius.    Had they called  his loans and the banks would  have gone down too.

About news of Trump tax return stuff…

You have to be a calculating person to be a politician.  Including disclosure of financial disclosure forms.

Trump — an outsider — is not and has never been a politician.

Any tax return that utilizes laws looks different.  A  22 year  old tax return by a private citizen … Trump….is being used to attempt to damage him.

Trump’s support is precisely that he is an outsider.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/02/the-new-york-times-risked-legal-trouble-to-publish-donald-trumps-tax-return/


Continue reading “Why illegally publish Trump’s tax returns?”

Share
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com