Firenze Sage: Caged Cage

Soime things are very stupid to say to police: One is, Go ahead and arrest me! Hence, Cage got caged.

Share


Actor Nicholas Cage after an extra toddy was found in a loud set-to with his wife. When the cops arrived,they tried to send the Cages to their den but Nicholas uttered the 3d stupidest words one can utter. “Go ahead,arrest me.” So they did.

2nd stupidest: You won’t jump.
Number one: Go ahead and shoot!

FirenzeSage48@gmail.com

Share

Firenzie Sage: In the beginning there was this gay caveman… i-PAD app coming?

Main Kinder students get $500 i-PADS to learn ABCs. California students required to learn gay, lesbbian history. So maybe its time for a I-PAD app: “In the beginnning there was thsi gay caveman…”

Share

Time ripe for an i-PAD app “In the beginning there was this gay caveman …”

The California state Senate has approved legislation that requires California’s public schools to include gay history in social studies lessons.

Will they budget for field trips to public restrooms?

This fall, the school district in Auburn, Maine will hand out iPads to nearly 300 kindergartners, “confident the education apps will accelerate their learning.” Let see, give 5 year olds a game player and expect them to read, spell, and do math.

written by Firenzie Sage48@gmail.com

Share

Firenze Sage: Patient runs (amok) at asylum

Mentally ill patient had roam privledges and strangled staff. Why privledges?

Share

Psychiatric patient Massey strangled Donna Gross to death on the grounds of Napa State Hospital.

California Division of Occupational Safety and Health investigators found that Massey was awarded a “grounds pass” by facility staff, a privilege that allows patients to roam freely through the sprawling and shaded campus. Cal/OSHA investigators found that such a system exposed staff to danger.

Well duh!! Not the “campus” you remember?
Naturally an appeal has been filed.


FirenzeSage48@gmail.com

Share

Man bites dog, almost.

Man barks at police dog and policeman arrests him. Give us a break! No baying at the moon either?

Share

Man bites dog, almost

http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/109312

An Ohio man was charged with a misdemeanor for barking at a police dog.

Officer Bradley Walker wrote that he heard the K9 dog barking uncontrollably inside his patrol car while he was investigating a car crash at a pub early Sunday morning. Walker says Stephens was making barking noises and hissing at the animal.

Walker reported that Stephens said “the dog started it” when asked why he was harassing the animal. The officer said Stephens appeared highly intoxicated.
_______________

This ranks right up there with baying at the moon and unlawful yodeling.

JAJ48@aol.com http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/109312

Share

Sublime reasoning from our 9th circuit …

Supreme Court reverses 9th circuit decision regarding removal of blacks from a jury saying that the reasoning of the 9th circuit is inexplicable and unexplainable.

Share
Sublime reasoning from our 9th circuit

Firenze Sage

Two of three African American jurors were excused by the DA. This is a no no if done for reasons of race. The DA said he did it because one disliked cops and the other was a social worker.

Three (3) other courts said it was OK, and then came this opinion from the 9th circuit which is not exactly chock full of information about why.

“The prosecutor’s proffered race-neutral bases for peremptorily striking the two African-American jurors were not sufficient to counter the evidence of purposeful discrimination in light of the fact that two out of three prospective African-American jurors were stricken, and the record reflected different treatment of comparably situated jurors.”

The US Supreme court unanimously had this to say,”That decision is as inexplicable as it is unexplained. It is reversed.”

Share

Time to “re-certify” activist judges like Abrahamson of Wisconsin every year?

Follow the money: unions, public employees, lawyers

Activist judge Abrahamson of Wisconsin wants conservative Prosser unseated and her former intern JoAnne Kloppenburg seated next to her on the Supreme Court. And it looks like voter fraud occurred in this race in which the Democrats spent $3 million to help Kloppenberg. So what’s to be done about this messy conflict of interest situation? Will Abrahamson recluse herself?

Brian Bolduc: Wisconsin’s Chief Injjustice “On the homepage, I profile Shirley Abrahamson, chief justice of Wisconsin’s supreme court. From all appearances, she’s an activist judge par excellence. Besides arrogating to the court legislative powers, she’s trying to unseat her conservative colleague, Justice David Prosser, so her former intern, JoAnne Kloppenburg, can secure a liberal majority on the court, a source tells me. Here’s the lede:

Atop Wisconsin’s supreme court sits Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson. And an unhappy chief is she. Conservatives outnumber liberals on the court by four to three, forcing Abrahamson to dissent in 37 percent of the cases during the 2009–10 term. Meanwhile, the legal challenge to Gov. Scott Walker’s “budget repair” bill is rushing toward the court’s docket.

If only she had one more vote.

“The election for a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court has ended in a dead heat. When John described it as a “photo finish” earlier this morning, Prosser was up by 835. By the time all of the precincts from Milwaukee County belatedly reported later in the day, Kloppenburg had taken a lead of 311 votes out of 1.5 million cast (a huge turnout for such an election). A recount is virtually certain.

The Wisconsin Republicans had better get some very high-powered election lawyers at work on the case and do it now if they hope to win.

Doing so enabled George Bush to win in Florida in 2000. Not doing so handed the Washington governorship to the Democrats in 2004. The Republican Dino Rossi was ahead on election night and in the automatic recount that followed. But a hand count, and some very conveniently discovered absentee ballots in heavily Democratic King County (Seattle), gave the race to the Democrat Christine Gregoire. And not doing so handed the Minnesota senate seat to Al Franken in 2008. Again the Republican was ahead after election night, but the lead vanished in the recounts and dubious absentee ballots.

“In both cases, the Republicans were outlawyered. Unfortunately Wisconsin election law practically begs people to commit election fraud. It has same-day registration, which allows people to show up at the polls, register with minimal ID requirements, and then vote. Don’t have ID? No problem! All you need is someone who is registered in the same city to vouch for you. According to John Fund of the Wall Street Journal, perhaps the country’s leading expert on voter fraud,

“A 67-page 2008 report by investigators for the Milwaukee Police Department blew the whistle on what it called an “illegal organized attempt to influence the outcome of [the 2004] election in the state of Wisconsin”—a swing state where recent presidential elections have often been very close. The report found that in 2004 between 4,600 and 5,300 more votes were counted in Milwaukee than the number of voters recorded as having cast ballots. Absentee ballots were cast by people living elsewhere; ineligible felons not only voted but worked at the polls; transient college students cast improper votes; and homeless voters possibly voted more than once. The report found that in 2004 a total of 1,305 “same day” voters gave information that was declared “un-enterable” or invalid by election officials.

The long-term solution, of course, is to curb absentee balloting and require as much ID to vote as you need to get into airplanes and many office buildings these days.
But the short-term solution in this election, sad to say, is to lawyer up—to hire a Dobermann, if need be—before uncounted absentee ballots start appearing in the front seat of election officials’ cars as they did in Christine Gregoire’s Washington in 2004.

Share

Barry Bonds’s follies … from Firenze Sage

“Hoskins, the government’s leadoff witness, testified that he had spent years trying to persuade Bonds to stop using steroids. As part of that effort, he said he talked frequently about Bonds and steroids to Ting, an orthopedist who performed eight operations on the former Giants star.

But when he testified Thursday, Ting flatly denied he had ever discussed Bonds’ alleged steroid use with Hoskins. The testimony undercut the testimony of Hoskins, a star government witness.” From the SF Chronicle.

This is hilarious. One legal fable is that you never ask a question when you don’t know the answer. But not to know what your witness is going to say about anything is absurd.

In a nutshell government witness Hoskins says he and Dr. Ting had long talks about Bonds and steroid use.Government witness Dr. Ting says he never talked to Hoskins.

Oops!

But the plot thickens as Hoskins has now announced he has a previously lost tape of his conversation with Dr. Ting.

So has the prosecution blundered or have they sandbagged the good doctor? But if that’s the case why call him in the first place.
Stay tuned.

Share

Senators McCain, Lieberman & Graham have no idea what they are doing re Lybia says Firenze Sage

Senators McCain, Lieberman and Graham sink America in another war in the middle east. Obama incompetent. McCain, Lieberman and Graham have no idea what they are doing. Idiots!

Share

comments from Firenze Sage on article: The Senators Sway
from National Review Online by Andrew L. McCartney April 2, 2011


Do these idiots — Senators McCain, Lieberman and Graham — have any idea of what they are doing?


Obama is astoundingly incompetent.
Who did we ditch Mubarack for? How about another Islamic state. Who are the Libyan rebels? Islamic al Queda. Hillary thinks the Saville suited barbarian running Syria is “a reformer”. Yemen is going fast. And on it goes while Obama is thinking of his next Cairo speech.

article from National Review Online titled: The Senators Sway

Before they wanted to kill Qaddafi, they were celebrating in his tent.John McCain, Joseph Lieberman, and Lindsey Graham are the Senate’s most energetic proponents of sinking the nation ever deeper into the Libyan morass.

In a joint interview on Fox last weekend, Senators McCain (R., Ariz.) and Lieberman (I., Conn.) were breathless in their rendering of the “freedom fighters” and the “Arab Spring” of spontaneous “democracy.” Friday they upped the ante with a Wall Street Journal op-ed, rehearsing yet again what an incorrigible thug Qaddafi is and how “we cannot allow [him] to consolidate his grip” on parts of Libya that he still controls.

For his part, Senator Graham (R., S.C.) told CNN Wednesday that he would like President Obama to designate Qaddafi an “unlawful enemy combatant” with an eye toward legitimizing the strongman’s assassination. He and Wolf Blitzer discussed whether the hit could be pulled off by the covert intelligence operatives President Obama has inserted in Libya. The next day, in his plaintive questioning of Defense Secretary Robert Gates at a Senate hearing, Senator Graham wondered why American air power could not just “drop a bomb on him, to end this thing.”

As a matter of law, Graham’s proposal is ludicrous — no small thanks to federal law that Graham himself helped write, about which more in an upcoming column. What was especially striking about the hearing was the tone of righteous indignation Senators Graham and McCain took in whipping the Obama administration over government blundering.

But what about their own blundering? The senators most strident about the purported need to oust Qaddafi, to crush his armed forces, and to kill him if that’s what it takes to empower the rebels, are the very senators who helped fortify Qaddafi’s military and tighten the despotic grip of which they now despair.

It was only a short time ago, in mid-August 2009, that Senators McCain, Lieberman, and Graham, along with another transnational progressive moderate, Sen. Susan Collins (R., Maine), paid a visit to Qaddafi’s Tripoli compound. If they seem to have amnesia about it now, perhaps that’s because the main item on the agenda was their support for the Obama administration’s offer of military aid to the same thug the senators now want gone yesterday.

A government cable (leaked by Wikileaks) memorializes the excruciating details of meetings between the Senate delegation and Qaddafi, along with his son Mutassim, Libya’s “national security adviser.” We find McCain and Graham promising to use their influence to push along Libya’s requests for C-130 military aircraft, among other armaments, and civilian nuclear assistance. And there’s Lieberman gushing, “We never would have guessed ten years ago that we would be sitting in Tripoli, being welcomed by a son of Muammar al-Qadhafi.” That’s before he opined that Libya had become “an important ally in the war on terrorism,” and that “common enemies sometimes make better friends.”

On and on it goes, made all the more nauseating by the reality that nobody was under any illusion that Qaddafi had truly reformed. McCain made a point of telling the press that “the status of human rights and political reform in Libya will remain a chief element of concern.” Note the gentle diplomatic understatement: Qaddafi is — and was, as McCain well knew — a savage autocrat. Yet this brute fact was softened into “an element of concern” regarding “the status of human rights and political reform.” Pretty sharp contrast from the senator’s sardonic grilling of the U.S. defense secretary on Thursday. The McCain who was face-to-face with Qaddafi was very different from the McCain who today rails about Qaddafi. Back in the tent, none of his concern would dampen the cozy mood. The Arizonan swooned over “the many ways in which the United States and Libya can work together as partners.”

The above article is from the National Review Online by Andrew C. McCartney titled The Seantors Sway. Comments on the article are by the Firenze Sage.

Share

Did Barry Bonds lie under oath? Firenze Sage comments….

So when do we hear about Barry Bonds lieing under oath — purjury?

Share


Barry Bonds is on trial for perjury.
For reasons unknown to me the testimony of another ballplayer is introduced to say he got steroids from Bonds’ trainer. This is after Bonds’ ex mistress says Bonds was going to decapitate her.

When do we get to perjury (lying under oath) or are we to hear more about Bonds kicking his dog. So at this point we know that Bonds’ trainer provides steroids and that Bonds says nasty things.

Giambi: I got steroids from Barry Bonds’ trainer
03/30/11
“Former New York Yankee and Oakland Athletics baseball player Jason Giambi walks up to the federal court building in San Francisco on Tuesday to testify in the Barry Bonds, criminal perjury trial.”

“Jason Giambi, the former New York Yankees and Oakland Athletics slugger, testified Tuesday that he got undetectable steroids and other banned drugs from Barry Bonds’ weight trainer.”

Share

Perhaps Tea Party Patriots hamstrung from robust politcal speech because its a 501c3 charity?

Why give money to a 501c4 charity such as the Tea Party Patriots if they cannot engage in “robust” political speech such as telling President Obama to leave the oval office ASAP and go back to doing a job for which he has competence — not politics, not as President, not as a lawyer, not teaching constitutional law.

Share

Nationally, the Tea Party Patriots is organized a a 501c4 charitable organization. Which means (??) certain regulations apply as to what political activity the Tea Party Patriots can engage in. For sure, taking educating the publicc as to the deficit and taking a stand for reduction of the federal deficit should be OK activities. However — as a 501c3 organized as a charitable organization — The Tea Party Patriots cannot have a bias for or against any individual political campaign. That means the Tea Party Patriots cannot oppose Obama’s 2012 campaign.

So as not to run into the IRE of the IRS, perhaps it’s best that 2-3 families on every block in America organize their individual Block Tea Parties — without any formal mechanism.

Political speech is one of the most protected forms of speech. But, probably political speech — for example, that ObamaCare as preached by President Obama is about as transparent as the Obama and Pelosi are (“we must vote for it so we know what’s in it) is political speech that a 501c3 cannot engage in.

So, is it smart to give money to the Tea Party Patriots when they cannot fully engage in “robust” political speech? Like, telling President Obama, get out of the Oval office and go back to doing whatever you can do for a job! Below are some contact numbers for the Tea Party Patriots. Maybe they have other ideas how to do robust speech against President Obama himself. Remember Rush Limbaugh when he said, “I hope he fails!” Yes I want the Tea Parties activists to say something like that.

Your Tea Party Patriots National Coordinator Team,
Debbie Dooley, Jenny Beth Martin, Mark Meckler, Sally Oljar, Diana Reimer, and Dawn Wildman

TPP Support email: support@teapartypatriots.org
TPP Support phone number: 404-593-0877

Jenny Beth Martin (jennybethm@gmail.com, Twitter @jennybethm, Facebook)
Dawn Wildman (dmwlaw1@cox.net)
Mark Meckler (mark@teapartypatriots.org)
Debbie Dooley (debbie0040@yahoo.com)

Tea Party Patriots, Inc. operates as a social welfare organization organized under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions to Tea Party Patriots, Inc. are not deductible as charitable contributions for income tax purposes.
1025 Rose Creek Dr, 620-322, Woodstock, GA 30189

Home

For America’s Future

Tea Party Sunshine

Join us in shining a light on our governments from the federal to the local level, sunshine is the best way to ensure transparency and accountability.

American Policy Summit

If you missed the 1st Annual American Policy Summit, you can see what you missed here.
Quick Links
TeaPartyPatriots.org
Donate
TPP Store
Find A TPP Group
Health Care Compacts

Thanks for Your Support

Share