Pre-enactment anxiety caused by Trump. Irreparable harm to sanctuary cities caused by Trump threatening to enforce existing laws on the books concerning immigration. That’s what a San Francisco judge ruled.
Pre-enactment anxiety disorder. What in the world is that? It’s not in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM 5). That ‘s the newly minted mental disorder which San Francisco and Santa Clara are said to suffer from says federal judge Orrick in defense of his stay of Trump’s executive order to enforce existing laws regarding immigration.
Just the thought of withholding money to Sanctuary cities who refuse to cooperate with federal immigration causes such anxiety that San Francisco and Santa Clara county are harmed so says judge Orrick.
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A federal judge on Tuesday blocked any attempt by the Trump administration to withhold funding from “sanctuary cities” that do not cooperate with U.S. immigration authorities, saying the president has no authority to attach new conditions to federal spending.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick issued the preliminary injunction in two lawsuits — one brought by the city of San Francisco, the other by Santa Clara County — against an executive order targeting communities that protect immigrants from deportation.
That’s exactly what conservative states did two years ago when they asked a federal judge in Brownsville, Texas, to block Obama’s plan to defer deportation for 4 million undocumented immigrants. The judge, Andrew Hanen, did just that, issuing a nationwide order that ultimately was upheld by an evenly split Supreme Court.
The Obama administration decried the reach of Hanen’s order, calling it “drastically overbroad” in a 2015 court filing.
Now it’s conservatives who are protesting use of the tactic. When a federal judge in Hawaii said last month that Trump couldn’t block travel from a group of predominantly Muslim countries, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said he was “amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific” could block the president’s policy.
Aptos Psychologist: Try that argument with the Internal Revenue Service. Dear IRS, you are causing me to feel “pre-enactment anxiety” just at the thought of taking away my money. You’ve caused me irreparable harm. Think that argument — “pre-enactment anxiety” — will work talking to the IRS?
What a 61 K per year education gets you. Middlebury College seems dead-set on adhering to social justice norms by apologizing for the violence that occurred when social scientist Charles Murray came to speak—not apologizing to Murray, the professor rioters injured, or the students who wanted to hear Murray’s speech, but to the rioters who shut it all down.
In a post for The Middlebury Campus, Bert Johnson, chair of the school’s political science department and an associate professor, apologized to the students who were upset over Murray’s invitation, writing that he should have consulted with dissenting students before co-sponsoring the event.
Firenze Sage: The college is going forward with its Ivan the Terrible memorial to celebrate the vandals not the victims.
“The new survey finds 46 percent saying they voted for Clinton and 43 percent for Trump, similar to her two-point national vote margin.
“Asked how they would vote if the election were held today, 43 say they would support Trump and 40 percent say Clinton.
Paul Bedard writes in the WashingtonExaminer.com April 23, 2017 that Donald Trump is the least popular president in modern times. It’s not until almost at the end of the article that Bedard writes that Hilary Clinton would still lose to Trump.
You may be at risk of Alzheimer’s . You can learn whether you have two copies of a particular gene called APOE4. If you do, you may receive early treatment from Novartis for Alzheimer’s even though you don’t yet have it. It’s a new strategy.
The Banner Alzheimer’s Institute tests people for the APOE4 gene. So far, about 35,000 people have signed up agreeing to send swabs of their cheek cells for testing.
The goal for Novartis AG is to recruit people whose genes put them at high risk for Alzheimer’s. These people, who do not yet have Alzheimer’s, will receive treatment as though they have Alzheimer’s.
Persons receive drugs to boost the immune system and clear beta amyloid from their blood. Persons with two copies of the APOE4 gene are two to three times more likely to get Alzheimer’s than the general population.
The above information is from an article in the Wall Street Journal April 24, 2017 titled Novartis Shifts Approach to Alzheimer’s Research.
Freedom to protect a country’s values? That’s what Australia is doing.
Australia recently broadened the test migrants must pass. The new test gauges a migrant’s attitude towards “Australian values”. The new test includes questions about child marriage, female genital mutilation and domestic violence.
Recently in Sidney a man wearing a Christian cross was beaten and had his cross taken from him by a group of Muslim men and women. Is it time for countries to defend their values?
Christians in Sydney, Australia, are being advised to hide their crosses after an Arabic-speaking gang shouting “F*** Jesus!” attacked a couple on a train while transport officers looked on from a “safe space” and did nothing.
The Sydney-based Daily Telegraph – a News Corp outlet unrelated to the Telegraph Media Group newspaper of the same name – reports the couple were attacked while riding the train through “Muslim enclaves” in south-west Sydney.
Five uniformed transport officers watched the attack take place but failed to intervene, Mike claimed, leaving the police to meet the train at a later station.
“I was born in Australia of Greek heritage,” Mike told the Telegraph. “I’ve always worn my cross. For [them] to rip it off and step on it has to be a religious crime.
Firenze Sage: Muslim enclave? Five uniformed transit officers stood by awaiting orders from HQ.
Below is a picture of the cross that was ripped from an Australian Greek Orthodox man by a group of Muslims while transit personnel watched. Authorities say transit personnel provide passenger service not protection.
“Transitioning the presidency between parties is one of the most complex undertakings in American politics. The change triggers an upheaval in the intangible mechanisms by which Washington runs: an incoming President is likely to be less familiar with formal structures, and the greater that gap, the heavier the responsibility of those advisers who are asked to fill it.
“This space has been traversed for nearly four months by Jared Kushner, whom I first met about 18 months ago, when he introduced himself after a foreign policy lecture I had given. We have sporadically exchanged views since.
As part of the Trump family, Jared is familiar with the intangibles of the President. As a graduate of Harvard and NYU, he has a broad education; as a businessman, a knowledge of administration. All this should help him make a success of his daunting role flying close to the sun.”
Zack Beauchamp writes:
“In private life, contra Kissinger, Kushner doesn’t have a lot of successes. His tenure as head of the New York Observer was disastrous, his family real estate company’s flagship skyscraper has low occupancy rates and a serious debt problem, and it’s been credibly reported that his dad bought his place at Harvard with a $2.5 million donation.”
Monterey Bay Forum: Does anyone really read Time magazine anymore?
Trump got votes because of racism one researcher says. Oh? Let’s look at his research.
According to a controversial new analysis by theWashington Post, Trump voters were motivated by “racism” more than a number of other factors — such as “authoritarianism — in their presidential ballot choice last November.
Guess how researchers measure “authoritarianism”: how you say you raise your kids, whether parents teach children to follow the rules or parents teach children to be sympathetic towards people. But, perhaps parents teach both? Why assume an either this or that?
The incendiary piece, titled “Racism motivated Trump voters more than authoritarianism” was written by Thomas Wood, an assistant professor of Political Science at Ohio State University, and proposes to examine the results of the latest American National Election Study (ANES) regarding voter attitudes.
To begin with, Wood only analyzed the opinions of white voters—his own racially biased choice.
How black voters feel about whites, or what motivated many blacks to vote for Trump is disregarded as irrelevant to his study. Yet, in looking at racism, why would an objective examiner only look at the attitudes of whites?
Second, in the four questions looked at by Wood, racism is never actually addressed. Instead, Wood employs a “symbolic racism scale” that interprets people’s views on programs like Affirmative Action as concealing a hidden racism that is never overtly expressed. Wood said that these attitudes are “coded as more racially biased.”
Firenze Sage: You must read the whole study to see what causes his conclusions to be racial. Essentially he takes attitudes, analyzes them and then calls you names.
Ex-President of Mexico Fox speaks at Berkeley. On immigration and other issues. Conservative Ann Coulter — scheduled to speak April 27 on immigration — cannot.
CAL Berkeley tells conservative Ann Coulter that the university cannot protect her from possible riots. Therefore, CAL Berkeley told Coulter she cannot come on campus to discuss immigration on April 27.
Don’t the police protect students and visitors to the CAL Berkeley campus?
It’s time for the Berkeley and Oakland police to protect life and property of students and visitors to the CAL Berkeley campus?
What did the former President of Mexico Fox say about immigration? That would be an interesting conversation — Ann Coulter and ex-President Fox discussing immigration.
Former President of Mexico Fox continues to engage in political discourse, most noticeably through his tweets in which Fox expresses his open disagreement with President Trump’s stances on immigration, and calls for the American public to “wake up.”
CAL Berkeley, a liberal college, had to “cancel” yet another guest speaker because of safety concerns. The Berkeley College Republicans, BridgeCal and Young America’s Foundation were planning on having Ann Coulter address their groups, until they received an email from the university’s vice chancellors.
“We have been unable to find a safe and suitable venue for your planned April 27 event featuring Ann Coulter,” vice chancellors Scott Biddy and Stephen Sutton emailed the student groups. “In the wake of events surrounding the planned appearance by (right-wing speaker) Milo Yiannopoulos in February, as well as several riots which have occurred in recent weeks in the city of Berkeley, we have increased our scrutiny regarding the time and location of high-profile speakers so that these events can go forward unimpeded.”
The university also requested that if Coulter should decide to still come to the campus, that they not disclose the location until closer to the event and only students would be allowed to attend. She agreed to the conditions but told the university she had her own conditions, as described on YAF’s blog:
1) That the University of California chancellor request that the Oakland chief of police refrain from telling his men to stand down and ignore law-breaking by rioters attempting to shut down conservative speakers, as he has done in the past; and
2) That UC-Berkeley announce in advance that any students engaging in violence, mayhem or heckling to prevent an invited speaker from speaking would be expelled.
As Coulter explained, “If Berkeley wants to have free speech, it can have it.”
Last week, conservative speaker David Horowitz’s speech was also canceled after UCB police told the student groups Horowitz’s safety could not be ensured. The decision was made after the university instructed the group to hold the event during the middle of the day and on the outskirts of campus.
The Republican groups on Cal’s campus feel the cancelation of conservative speakers is an infringement upon their First Amendment right to free speech.
Now the question becomes: will Berkeley ever do anything to ensure conservatives can come to the liberal hotbed without a riot ensuing?
My guess? It’s probably not at the top of their priority list.
UPDATE: Coulter spoke with The Hollywood Reporter, telling them:
“Yes, it was officially banned,” Coulter said of her planned April 27 appearance. “But they can’t stop me. I’m an American. I have Constitutional rights.”
Coulter had accepted an invitation from two campus groups — the Berkeley College Republicans and BridgeUSA — to deliver a speech about immigration, the topic of her last two books, both of which were New York Times bestsellers. “If that’s banned, then no conservative can speak,” Coulter told THR on Wednesday.
“Meanwhile, corrupt banana republic leaders like Vincente Fox have the red carpet rolled out for them on the taxpayer’s dime.” Fox, the former president of Mexico, spoke in Berkeley this week.
Aptos Community Gardeners!
Our PATHS — connecting the plots — need Cleanup on Saturday morinings April 22 & 29. Come say ‘hello’ to fellow gardeners.
Together everyone makes wonderful, beautiful vegetables and flowers every year. For the last SEVEN years! Wow!
Want a plot? Like more information? Come on Saturdays April 22 & 29 in the am and say hello. Gardening is fun!
Call 831 688 5727 extension 2 and leave a message for more information.