Firenze Sage: Fore!!

Michelle Obama on Monday told a fundraiser in Southern California of the toll the presidency has taken on her husband Barack Obama.

“I see the sadness and worry that’s creasing his face,” she said to a crowd of about 500 at the Pasadena luncheon organized by the Southern California Women For Obama. She described his [work] ethic as “tireless,” according to pool reports.

“He reads every word, every memo, so he is better prepared than the people briefing him,” she said. “This man doesn’t take a day off” says Michelle.
———————————————————————-

Michelle, He has played 71 rounds of golf as of June 6.
Do you know what else he does that you don’t know?

FirenzeSage48@gmail.com

Share

Aptos psychologist: autism? 4 questions ….

With young children, assessment of non-verbal communication is so important when assessing any condition including autism. Does the child look at you? Does the child point? See below for the other questions. DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

‘When toddlers arrive at Dr. Monika Symms’ office for their routine 18-month visit, the pediatrician gives parents a survey screening their children for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). She does this always, regardless of whether they have raised autism as a concern.

“Symms’ practice, Tribeca Pediatrics, developed the survey in accordance with guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and American Academy of Pediatrics. It includes 23 questions, but Symms says she pays particular attention to four: Is the child bringing you objects, making good eye contact, pointing at things and responding to his or her name? If not, it could be a red flag, prompting further evaluations to determine whether or not that patient has an ASD.

“I think that routine autism screening is absolutely important,” Symms told The Huffington Post. “There is so much misinformation and fear out there. It’s a great tool.”

But a new study released Monday suggests otherwise.

Researchers questioning if routine autism screening is actually an effective public health tool conducted a sweeping search of the existing scientific literature. They determined that there is not enough evidence to support the implementation of routine screening for autism.

The conclusion flies in the face of AAP’s current support of the practice. (Interestingly Pediatrics, which published the article, is the organization’s official journal.)

To arrive at their conclusion, the researchers asked seven different questions about the efficacy of screening. Of those, co-author Dr. Jan Willem Gorter of McMaster University in Canada, singled out three as the most important: Is autism a disorder that has a significant impact on the lives of people, are the tests effective and are there sufficient tools to help patients after a diagnosis?

Gorter said the researchers found that ASDs absolutely do have a clear and significant impact on the lives of people. But they found that current tests to diagnose the disorder were not effective enough — lacking specificity, sensitivity and proven predictive abilities.

Story continues below
As for the third question, the researchers concluded there was no “strong evidence” of the effectiveness of current autism therapies, adding that their availability is still limited.

“Many therapies are available, but none has curative outcome or even well-established efficacy to change the course of the condition,” they wrote. “The financial burden of the treatment can be extremely high, and cost-effectiveness has not been demonstrated.”

Gorter was quick to caution that there is a big difference between routine screening — which means surveying everyone, including apparently healthy people — and clinical surveillance, which means surveying those who present with impairments that indicate a possible problem.

“We as a group think that if parents have concerns, they should go for surveillance,” Gorter said. “But routine screening doesn’t necessarily address that and at this point, it may be premature.”

The AAP, which currently has 60,000 pediatrician members, currently recommends all children be screened at specific intervals, regardless of whether a concern has been raised, saying that pediatricians play a key role in early recognition of disorders.

Other groups have also thrown their support behind that recommendation.

In an email, Dr. Geraldine Dawson, chief science officer of Autism Speaks, the nation’s largest autism science and advocacy organization, said the group supported the AAP’s recommendation that children be screened at their 18 and 24-month checkups.

“Early intervention has been shown to result in significant increases in cognitive and language abilities and adaptive behavior,” she said, “allowing children the best chance for a positive outcome.”

Share

Aptos psychologist: babies need (?) hours a day physical contact, rocking …

Hold babies (?) hours a day

Is more better? How long to hold babies during the first six months?

Babies in America and Europe are typically held about 2 hours a day by their mothers/ caretakers. In the rest of the world babies are held double the time — about 4 hours a day.

Studies show that babies that are held more — cry less and sooth faster at six months of age. About 45% less crying. So, the old adage “you cannot spoil a baby by rocking and touch” still applies.

Some data from mice studies backs this up: Mice typically lick and groom their babies while they nurse. They wean their babies at 21 days. In one study, mice were removed from their mothers at day 10 through day 16 and then returned to their mothers. The six day away they were in a warm incubator and fed. But no touch, grooming or cuddle time with their mommy mice. Those mice grew up to be quite disturbed adult mice.

In another study each baby mouse was touched lightly on its head by a human. That caused the mommy mice to lick and lick and do extra grooming of their babies (to remove the smell of a human being). Those mice, given substantially extra physical contact and touch, grew up to be extraordinary resilient to stress. So more touch increased resilience to stress.

So maybe the rest of the world — which typically gives 4 hours a day of touch and contact to babies — has got it right.

You cannot touch your babies (nicely) too much.

How to do it in America with both parents working? Dads need to be involved: dads need to get the baby and care for the baby after feeding. And make arrangements so mom gets a nap during the day.

And bring in aunts, grandmothers and friends to help holding the baby. And do include lullabies … “Hush little baby, don’t you cry… papa gonna buy you a mockingbird….”

DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

Share

Firenze Sage: Aussie madness

women ask for it...

The old argument that “she was asking for it” has resurfaced in multicultural guise. Where are all the feminists?

This shocking report from Melbourne, Australia tells the tale of a male Libyan student recently arrived in Australia as a scholarship student, who sexually attacked 6 women, and a 13 year old girl a month after arriving in Australia.

The judge found that his sentence should be reduced because he was unable to cope with the way Australian women dress.

Obviously, the implication is that Australian women should don abayas and burkas, if they want to avoid being attacked, because Muslim men just can’t control tthemselves.
———————————————————-
Gee, when he grows up he can attack New York maids.

FirenzeSage48@gmail.com

Share

Firenze Sage: the case of the harmless bomb ….

A bomb scare at the federal courthouse at Seventh and Mission streets in San Francisco today turned out to be the result of a harmless electronic device.

The basement and first floor of the courthouse were evacuated for roughly six hours after police received a call about the package around 11:30 a.m., officers said. People on the second and third floors were told to shelter in place.

The police bomb squad spent hours trying to determine if it was dangerous, officers said. By the afternoon, they had determined it was a consumer electronic device.
——————————————–

Sheer genius by our watchdogs. The unseen bomb was judged to be lethal only for two floors.

Just what the hell is “shelter in place”? I guess it means give yourself a big big hug.

FirenzeSage48@aol.com

Share

Firenze Sage: Not another law…

No FOAM containers law

Getting takeout food in foam containers would be a thing of the past under a bill approved by the CA state Senate.

The bill by Democratic Sen. Alan Lowenthal of Long Beach prohibits vendors from providing prepared food in expanded polystyrene containers.

He plans to amend his bill in the Assembly to apply to restaurants and vendors after Jan. 1, 2016. It would apply to schools after July 1, 2017
———————————————————
Remember when these bozos met every other year. How about every 5 years for 2 weeks.

FirenzeSage48@gmail.com

Share

Firenze Sage: Well, Duh!!

which jurors for Rod Blagojevich?

Afghanistan — A commission appointed by President Hamid Karzai to assess responsibility for the massive fraud at Kabul Bank issued its report on Sunday, absolving the president’s brother of any blame.

The brother, Mahmoud Karzai, was among the bank’s politically connected shareholders and insiders who took out a total of $925 million in loans, often with no collateral or even documentation.
——————————————————
Reports that Blago wants the same jurors is unproven.

FirenzeSage48@gmail.com

Share

Firenze Sage: Merry-Go-Maze

A regulatory merry-go-maze in New York City to get permission for a simple restautant!

Share
to get licenses is a Merry-Go-Maze

A Merry-Go-Maze:
“In New York City, applying for the “right” to open a restaurant requires dealing with the conflicting demands of at least eleven municipal agencies, plus submitting to 23 city inspections and applying for 30 different permits and certificates. Not including the state liquor license.

Recognizing that this could all get very complicated, the city set up a new bureaucratic body to help you negotiate your way through all the other bureaucratic bodies.” Mark Steyn
—————————————————–
And this is before the state and the fed jump in.

FirenzeSage48@gmail.com

Share

Aptos, CA psychologist: Syria’s Assad is not a “reformer” as Clinton & Obama claim. Hear Dr. Jasser’s comments….

Syrian leader a "reformer" as Clinton claims?

Do you remember Hillary Clinton saying that the leader of Syria is a “reformer”. And that has been Presdient Obama’s position.

Forty years of repression say differently. Here’s comments from Dr. Jasser whose grandfather was a newspaperman in Syria. Dr. Jasser recommends a careful investigation of Dr. Chahabi…

May 28, 2011
words of Dr. Jasser:
“As we in the free-world have stood by and watched, 2011 has marked the awakening of the principles of freedom within the hearts of Arab people throughout the Middle East. Syria, which has long stood at the crossroads of the Middle East, today remains as one of the last functioning bastions of the secular fascist regimes.

This is no surprise to the millions of Syrians around the world most of whom escaped the slavery of the Assad regime. The Assads have held power through the outright brutalization of the Syrian people which has created a global Syrian culture of fear.

The pathologies within Syria after nearly a half a century of rule by one of the worst fascist regimes in humanity are multi-dimensional.

There are more Syrians living outside Syria than inside because so many have fled the brutality of the regime. And even though many of them now live in freedom after leaving their motherland, their behavior remains largely muted by the long tentacles of the Syrian government.

Any public comments or activities against the domestic and foreign interests of the Assad regime by any Syrians around the world may place close or even distant family members in harm’s way for reprisals including imprisonment and torture simply as a result of a vocal family member in the U.S. or outside of Syria.

Regimes like Assad’s know full well the impact which any global effort to isolate his government can have upon his longevity.

It is well known within the Syrian-expatriate network that the Assad regime has countless global sympathizers and agents who either directly or indirectly provide information to Damascus on any and all activities of Syrians who live abroad.

In exchange for this information they may get a number of benefits from simply being told that their families will be “left alone” to actually receiving financial benefits from the Syrian security apparatus. At times this information will lead to the detainment and torture of other Syrians domestically in order to obtain more information about anti-regime activities.

Information they obtain is used to create psychological countermeasures both in Syria and outside in order to prevent any type of movement against the interests of the Assad regime.

One cannot overstate the depth of coercion these influence operations have utilized for over 40 years to frighten Syrians around the world into submission even within the United States.The reality is that the “perception and implication of fear and intimidation” for those that escaped Syria can be overwhelming and paralyzing to all free speech.

In fact in my own reform work, while I have never even been to Syria because of my own family history, that fear was conveyed to me as a grim reality of having family within Syria’s walls.

So I remained relatively silent. As an American to this day I still cannot fathom that fear, but I realize it exists.

Incidentally, my grandfather, Zuhdi Jasser, was an ardent democracy activist who often lived in and out of house arrest writing newspaper columns under a pseudonym “Al-Karim” against many of the coups and military regimes in Syria in the 50’s and 60’s as the Baathists consolidated power in 1963 and then Hafez Assad came into power by 1970.

Assad’s iron fist was not to be messed with and eventually the people of Syria became quite passive, fearful, and inhumanly submissive to the regime.

Repeatedly, Assad’s henchmen would make public examples of anyone who spoke out against the regime including the massacre in Hama in 1982 that murdered over 40,000 Syrians including women and children in just a few weeks. Hama became the standard by which Syrians measured the lengths to which their oppressors would go to silence them. Today, the people of Dara’a, Banyas and other towns are feeling “Hama Rules” as Tom Friedman described them, but will not leave the streets because they know the fate that awaits them if they do.

With the recent uprisings, the chatter about the activities of the ‘Syrian intelligence network’ (mukhabarat) has risen to a level I have never personally seen or experienced. Yet, the courage exemplified by the freedom activists on the streets of Syria has certainly spilled over to all those Syrian Americans with a conscience in the United States seeking to help them and get their plight heard. Silence seems to no longer be an option for many Syrian Americans.
Demanding accountability from leading Syrian Americans: the Chahabi case study
There is an evolving controversy in Los Angeles that is a microcosm of the national and global battle against Assad’s regime and highlights the fault lines between Americans who stand for freedom and righteousness and those who facilitate Assad’s pariah state. The history, background, profile, and influence activities of Hazem Chahabi, M.D. a nuclear medicine specialist in Newport Beach, CA who owns and operates Newport Diagnostic Center while also serving as an honorary Consul General for the Syrian government in L.A. can serve as a case study.
Our domestic approach to Americans who are Assad sympathizers needs to become transparent. It is time for Syrian agents on American soil to finally feel the long overdue moral and public outrage they deserve for supporting one of humanity’s worst regimes. Imagine Hitler’s inner circle coming to the United States either while the Nazis were still in power or even afterwards and using the booty from the Third Reich to promote influence operations in the United States without public critique? It is time to finally breach the public fault lines against sympathizers of the Assad regime and begin to counter the influence operations for which Assad’s agents on American soil like Chahabi have been at the center.
In mid-March, Syrian Americans of conscience staged a rally outside the Consulate General of the Syrian government in Newport Beach, California (Chahabi’s office) against the Assad regime and for better U.S. support of the uprisings. The protesters appropriately chanted, “Say no more fear! Syria will be free!” Ammar Kahf of the Syria Emergency Task Force of Greater Los Angeles, the organizer of the demonstration stated, “on March 15, Syrians protested 48 years of one-party rule, state of emergency and continued repression.” They held another rally on April 17th in Los Angeles, however this time they were met bizarrely and brazenly with an opposing rally by overtsympathizers of the Assad fascist regime. These Assad sympathizers who staged this rally of sympathy for Assad’s evil, had the temerity to give young Syrian American children signs that said such detestable lies as, “Assad is Peace”. How typical though for Baathists to use children to do their dirty work. Stolen right from the pages of the Soviet counterinsurgency manuals from which their masters have learned. Mary Slasson of Neon Tommyreported that the anti-Assad activists believe that members of the pro Assad protesters”are paid informants by the [Syrian] government.” It has also been reported that anti-Assad activists are accusing the consulate staff of snapping photos of them at rallies around Southern California and passing information about them to the Syrian government’s intelligence agency.”
Remarkably, Kahf seems to be the first Syrian American in the L.A. area to lead such an effort to openly call out Dr. Chahabi, an American citizen, for his relationship with Syrian President Bashar Assad and his regime. Kahf points out that Chahabi’s behaviors and position with the Syrian government as a Consul General are not compatible with his position on the University of California-Irvine Foundation Board of Trustees. I also believe more importantly his position is not compatible with his citizenship oath as an American. Kahf appropriately called upon Chahabi to either dissociate himself from the Assad regime or be removed from the UC-Irvine Foundation Board. Matt Coker of theOrange County Weekly seems to be the only one reporting on this controversy. He notes that, “it is the opinion of many Syrian Americans that Chahabi is a government stooge…”
But the story of Chahabi goes far deeper than simply his position as Consul General and his offensive lip service for the pariah state of Syria he serves. A little basic research exposes that Chahabi’s family is far more intimately involved with Bashar Assad and his henchmen than anybody has cared to report. And for a leading California physician who sits on a major university’s foundation board of trustees, has served on the California Medical Board, and donated vast untold sums of monies to UCI and various politicians across the country this should have been a public scandal long ago. Perhaps the courageous people on the streets of Syria can bring us to a teaching moment against the culture of corruption that connects Dr. Chahabi and his family friend, Dr. Assad.

First, a little relevant background. Hazam Chahabi’s father is Hikmat Chahabi (also spelled Shihabi) who was one of Hafez Assad’s right hand henchmen. He was a Syrian Army general who served as Chief of Staff of the Army from 1974-1998. He received a degree in “Intelligence” from the Soviets in 1970. It is well known that the many of the Baathists leading military generals much like Chahabi learned their advanced thuggery from the Soviets. Chahabi was part of Hafez Assad’s inner circle serving on the “committee in charge of running the country” along with General Mustafa Tlass and Ali Duba known as leading criminals against humanity in Syria during the regime of Hafez Assad. Chahabi was head of the army when tanks surrounded Hama in 1982 and committed genocide against over 40,000 Syrians including women and children led by Rifat Assad. There was a similar heinous massacre in Tadmur in 1980against political prisoners with thousands dying in cold blood at the hands of the Syrian military. The Syrian Human Rights Committee has a detailed accounting of the massacre and murders as well as a number of other crimes against humanity perpetrated by Hafez Assad and his military (of whom General Hikmat Chahabi was a leading figure).
In fact, in his book, Killing Mr. Lebanon: The Assassination of Rafik Harriri and its impact on the Middle East (2007), Nicholas Blanford described in detail the coordinating role which General Hikmat Chahabi played in the Syrian occupation of Lebanon and the control of that nation’s infrastructure through a vast network of corruption. General Chahabi was part of the controlling clique of Syrian military generals that included Abdel Halim Khaddam, Ghazi Kanaan, and Walid Jumblatt. Lebanon was basically a Syrian colony controlled by this clique. Blanford additionally noted that the Syrian government in essence looted the Lebanese economy providing billions of dollars of cash infusion (some placed it at $4 billion per year by the end of the 90s) into an ailing Syrian economy.
Specifically, Blanford gives a number of examples of the deep corruption which this clique utilized to rape the Lebanese economy. He notes,
…Often using Lebanese politicians as front men, senior figures in Syria and their local allies are alleged to have made immense profits from the Lebanese reconstruction boom in the 1990s receiving protection commissions and securing monopolies in a wide array of sectors and selling goods and services at inflated rates.… Among the most well known was the awarding of Lebanon’s first mobile phone contracts to two companies, Cellis and Libancell, headed by Lebanese closely associated with Abdel-Halim khaddam and Hikmat Shehabi and their sons. With competitors barred from entering the market, these two companies were allowed to charge exorbitant fees, among the highest in the world at 13 cents per minute compared to 3 to 8 cents elsewhere in the Arab world.
Hazem Chahabi, M.D., Hikmat’s son, had been conveniently made Consul General in Newport Beach on October 12, 1995. He was obviously in place as honorary consulate while his father was still Chief of staff of the Syrian army and Hafez and his henchmen were still in control. In July 1998, General Chahabi handed in his resignation to Hafez and then joined his son in California for retirement. Mercifully to the Syrian people, Hafez died suddenly in 2000 at the age of 69. The ensuing power struggle in various branches of the government, police, intelligence, and military as Bashar took over the reins resulted in some reports that Hikmat may have been targeted for corruption charges- a euphemism for competitive thugs vying for control. Hikmat left apparently to avoid this mafia-like battle. Since then Hazem’s father, General Chahabi has even reportedly returned to Syria a few times for rather public visits with Bashar that probably provided cover for his family’s loyalty to Bashar amidst various power struggles. The Chahabis to the best of my knowledge have never uttered a known public rebuke of the evil perpetrated by Assad or his madmen including Hikmat Chahabi his Army chief of staff for almost 25 years. In fact a simple case could be made that General Chahabi and his son have the blood and enslavement of thousands upon thousands of Syrians on their hands not to mention the raping and pillaging of the Syrian and Lebanese economies and the incomes of their citizens.
It remains incredulous that in today’s age of information, these details about the Chahabis are not part of the recent reporting and public discussion about the complicity of Hazem Chahabi and his network of influence. With Dr. Hazem Chahabi’s close familial connections to the Assads and the Syrian military, the next question is what level of accountability should have been expected by the American taxpayer and members of institutions to which Dr. Chahabi belongs with regards to his corrupt Syrian bedfellows. With contributions registered regularly to candidates in congressional races like Loretta Sanchez (D-CA) and Keith Ellison (D-MN), it does not even seem to pass the sniff test that an open foreign agent (Consul General) of a pariah state should have such major financial influence upon American institutions with no public or personal accountability at all.
There needs to be an immediate public investigation into what Hazem Chahabi received if anything in exchange for all of those donations and more importantly what impact his involvement at UCI and in various political campaigns had upon American policy toward the pariah state of Syria. There also needs to be an investigation into why Chahabi’s history was not a red flag to any of the institutions and politicians to whom he gave donations or was given positions of leadership. The Chahabis have given apparently vast sums of money to University of California-Irvine (UCI)- underwriting events like the UCI Medal winners dinner where they gave $100,000 in 2003. The Chahabis later gave many additional donations to UCI including the largest ever single donation of $1 million in 2005. It would also be interesting to know who the initial investors were in Dr. Chahabi’s Newport Beach Diagnostic Center opened in theearly 90’s.
In essence as an American taxpayer with particular concern about the influence operations in the United States and the barbarism of the Assad regime against their own citizens, it is imperative for Dr. Chahabi to be questioned publicly about his complicity. The taxpayers all have an interest in knowing how much of his donations and contributions were directly connected to monies obtained from corruption his father and he were connected to in their leadership circles with the fascist regime of Hafez Assad and his son Bashar. The taxpayers have an interest in knowing what financial connections remain between Syria and the Chahabis. Were the millions he and his wife have donated proceeds from his practice, or were they monies obtained via his father or directly from the pillaging done by their clique during his father’s direct association with the Syrian regime, an association which his son continues to this day?

At the minimum, Chahabi’s much publicized philanthropy bought him a pathological blindness from the local community of southern California regarding the corruption in Syria of which his family came out of and remained uncritically and intimately enmeshed. Perhaps Dr. Chahabi’s move to the United States for medical specialization training and his posting as an ‘honorary’ Consul General combined with his father’s marginalization from Hafez Assad’s inner circle became an opportunity for the Chahabis to remain relevant and wealthy by becoming leaders in the current American influence operations of the Bashar Assad regime. It is exceedingly important for such an influential Californian to be transparent about the origin of the millions he donates to American institutions.
There is much to be concerned about with the sinister history, origins, and network of the Chahabi wealth and influence operation on American soil. It’s time to open an investigation and make an example of Dr. Chahabi.

This should also put on notice every other Syrian-American citizen like him who enjoys the freedoms which America gives them while dishonoring our nation through their overt and covert facilitation of Assad’s pariah state of Syria. Our United States of America deserves better. Our motherland of Syria and its courageous citizens deserve better.

Share

Aptos, CA psychologist: We CAN fix the Achilles heel weakness of Ryan’s medicare reform plan!

Try out now Ryan’s “premium support” by offering it to seniors age 55+ who have a private medical plan. Select a fixed number by lottery and try it out. If good enough for your Congressman it is good enough for the average citizen.

Share

Dip into healing waters

The Achilles heel weakness: In Ryan’s medicare reform plan the federal government imposes it by fiat on all recipients of a certain age There is a way to fix this weakness.

Instead of years out, offer the medicare reform plan now.

Instead of imposing it on millions, try it out by lottery on a few thousand people.

Instead of denying “premium plus” to those over a certain age, off it now to any senior age 55+ with current health insurance and wants to switch.

Dip Ryan’s “premium care” plan now into the healing waters of voluntary use by seniors age 55+.

This will heal the Achilles heel of Ryan’s medicare plan. When seniors who are not permitted coverage under Ryan’s plan (as too old) embrace it as good that will provide factual proof of its utility.

Who could set this up? There is a woman who, thwarted from political office in New York, created a terrific charter school in Harlem, New York. Students get entry to that school by lottery. That school competes successfully with the top private schools in New York City.

This is the kind of person who could quickly put together the necessary resources to try out a voluntary form of Ryan’s “premium support” medicare reform. What is her name?
DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

Share