Married white women are deplorable [do what men tell them says Hilary Clinton]

white women voted for Trump because men told them to do so —

Why white married women voted for Trump?

Hillary Clinton said that white women voted for President Trump during the 2016 presidential election because their husbands told them to, during a discussion at the India Today Conclave on Saturday.

The moderator asked Clinton why she thinks almost 52 percent of white women voted for Trump, despite them knowing about the controversial “Access Hollywood” tape.

“[Democrats] do not do well with white men and we don’t do well with married, white women,” Clinton explained. “And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should.”

————————————————

Firenze Sage:  Will this hag ever broom her way under the carpet?  

Share

connect the dots …. Is Obama the principal person behind the Trump/ Russia collusion story?

 

collusion

Is Obama the principal  person behind the Trump/ Russia collusion story?

Clinton  had a simple message why people should elect her  — that Trump was “unfit”.   Prior to the election that was her message to the American public. That’s about all she had to say. Her message did not sell sufficient for her to win the election.

Within 24 hours of losing the election Hilary Clinton’s campaign put out the message that Trump’s victory was not on the up and up — that he obtained it unfairly due to the Russians.  Due to Trump/  Russian involvement in our elections.

What we know now is that Hilary Clinton paid for and   created   information — none yet  collaborated — that Trump  supposedly performed unfit behavior.    That is what is referred to as the Trump/ Steele dossier aka ‘Golden Showers’.

So first Hillary calls Trump ‘unfit’ and then she pays money and supplies information to create information to supposedly support her contention.

Now the evidence points towards Obama as  is  the person behind it all.  And it appears that Obama’s motive was and is to protect himself.

Remember the basic facts about Obama. He was a Chicago politician.  He won his first elections by spreading ‘dirt’ about his opponents.  He was a community organizer.  He has a law degree and taught constitutional law.

Remember all of Obama’s promises that he did not keep…. such as ‘you can keep your doctor…’

Obama promised the American public that Hilary Clinton would be treated the same as any other American.  And then Obama exonerated Hilary Clinton  and Obama  expected his Justice Dept and FBI to also exonerate Hilary Clinton.  Which they did.

The facts  keep tumbling out.

What’s especially troubling is that mainstream press, i.e., New York Times  and Washington Post prefer  to suppress  or ignore the story.

 

Cameron Jackson

Share

Hilary Clinton’s chickens come home to roost? Who colluded with who?

 

Hilary Clinton’s  chickens come home to roost?

Hilary Clinton’s chickens   come home to roost? Who really colluded with whom?

Hilary and the Democrat Party colluded to create fake information [the Trump dossier] which — for the past year — has affected many people’s reputations.

For nearly a year, the media has pounded away on the narrative that Trump colluded and stole the election from Hilary.

Hilary Clinton’s  campaign message  for President  was simple and consistent:   Trump is not fit to serve.

Now we learn via the Washington Post 10/24/17   that  Hilary Clinton  ‘knew’ Trump’ was supposedly unfit because she  and the Democrat Party paid the bill to create  false info about Trump.

Hilary Clinton and the Democratic National Party (DNC) paid $9+ MILLION for Fusion GPS to pay Christopher Steele  to create the dossier on Trump.

What is Fusion GPS?    hiding? Fusion GPS describes itself as a “research and strategic intelligence firm” founded by “three former Wall Street Journal investigative reporters.” But congressional sources say it’s actually an opposition-research group for Democrats, and the founders, who are more political activists than journalists, have a pro-Hillary Clinton, anti-Trump agenda.

“These weren’t mercenaries or hired guns,” a congressional source familiar with the dossier probe said. “These guys had a vested personal and ideological interest in smearing Trump and boosting Hillary’s chances of winning the White House.”

Dirt digging by Fusion GPS:  Fusion GPS was on the payroll of an unidentified Democratic ally of Clinton when it hired  long-retired British spy   Christopher Steele to dig up dirt on Trump. In 2012, Democrats hired Fusion GPS to uncover dirt on GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney. And in 2015, Democratic ally Planned Parenthood retained Fusion GPS to investigate pro-life activists protesting the abortion group.

___________

Take away:  Now we know why Hilary Clinton was so adamant that she ‘knew’ that Trump is unfit to serve.  She ‘knows’ because she paid lots of money to create false  information on Trump  via Fusions GPS.

Next step: Let’s  require Fusion GPS to open up it’s books.  We may learn a lot more about who colluded with whom when that happens.

Like exactly who profited from the sale of 20 percent of USA uranium to Russia when Hilary Clinton was Secretary of State.  Did Hilary  collude?

And,  why now is the Washington Post and its backers willing to throw Hilary Clinton under the bus?  Because she just won’t go away?

written by Cameron Jackson

_

Share

Trump still beats Clinton a Wash Post poll finds

 

Democratic U.S. presidential candidate Hillary Clinton meets with civil rights leaders at the National Urban League in the Manhattan borough of New York City, February 16, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Segar - RTX277XM

Trump still beats Hilary 43% to 40% in Washington Post poll – were election today.

Vote for Trump or Hilary today?  The Washington Post does a survey:

“The new survey finds 46 percent saying they voted for Clinton and 43 percent for Trump, similar to her two-point national vote margin.

“Asked how they would vote if the election were held today, 43 say they would support Trump and 40 percent say Clinton.

____________

Paul Bedard writes in the WashingtonExaminer.com April 23, 2017 that Donald Trump is the least popular president in modern times.  It’s not until almost at the end of the article that Bedard writes that Hilary Clinton would still lose to  Trump.

Share

My, My — Hilary Clinton hoisted by her petard? hurt by Podesta

Hilary suffers injury from her campaign manager Podesta

Hilary suffers injury from her campaign manager Podesta

 Hoisted by her petard?  Hilary   — who uses Podesta to injure her opponents  —  has  been ‘injured’ by Podesta — who is Hilary’s campaign manager.  Those emails Hilary wanted erased are coming back to haunt her.

 Petard:  Injured by the devise (person) you intended to use to injure others.

Evidence Shows How Phishing Scammers Hacked Into Clinton Campaign

October 28, 2016 7:48 PM

WASHINGTON (CBS/AP) — New evidence appears to show how hackers earlier this year stole more than 50,000 emails of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, an audacious electronic attack blamed on Russia’s government and one that has resulted in embarrassing political disclosures about Democrats in the final weeks before the U.S. presidential election.

The hackers sent John Podesta an official-looking email on Saturday, March 19, that appeared to come from Google. It warned that someone in Ukraine had obtained Podesta’s personal Gmail password and tried unsuccessfully to log in, and it directed him to a website where he should “change your password immediately.”

Podesta’s chief of staff, Sara Latham, forwarded the email to the operations help desk of Clinton’s campaign, where staffer Charles Delavan in Brooklyn, New York, wrote back 25 minutes later, “This is a legitimate email. John needs to change his password immediately.”

But the email was not authentic.

The link to the website where Podesta was encouraged to change his Gmail password actually directed him instead to a computer in the Netherlands with a web address associated with Tokelau, a territory of New Zealand located in the South Pacific. The hackers carefully disguised the link using a service that shortens lengthy online addresses. But even for anyone checking more diligently, the address — “google.com-securitysettingpage” — was crafted to appear genuine.

In the email, the hackers even provided an Internet address of the purported Ukrainian hacker that actually traced to a mobile communications provider in Ukraine. It was also notable that the hackers struck Podesta on a weekend morning, when organizations typically have fewer resources to investigate and respond to reports of such problems. Delavan, the campaign help-desk staffer, did not respond immediately to the AP’s questions about his actions that day.

It is not immediately clear how Podesta responded to the threat, but five months later hackers successfully downloaded tens of thousands of emails from Podesta’s accounts that have now been posted online. The Clinton campaign declined to discuss the incident. Podesta has previously confirmed his emails were hacked and said the FBI was investigating.

The suspicious email was among more than 1,400 messages published by WikiLeaks on Friday that had been hacked from Podesta’s account.

It was not known whether the hackers deliberately left behind the evidence of their attempted break-in for WikiLeaks to reveal, but the tools they were using seven months ago still indicate they were personally targeting Podesta: Late Friday, the computer in the Netherlands that had been used in the hacking attempt featured a copy of Podesta’s biographical page from Wikipedia.

The U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Homeland Security Department have formally accused Russian state-sponsored hackers for the recent string of cyberattacks intended to influence the presidential election.

The help-desk staffer, Delevan, emailed to Podesta’s chief of staff a separate, authentic link to reset Podesta’s Gmail password and encouraged Podesta to turn on two-factor authentication. That feature protects an account by requiring a second code that is separately sent to a cell phone or alternate email address before a user can log in. “It is absolutely imperative that this is done ASAP,” Delevan said.

Tod Beardsley, a security research manager at the Boston-based cybersecurity firm Rapid7, said the fact that an IT person deemed the suspicious email to be legitimate “pretty much guarantees the user who is not an IT person is going to click on it.”

Other emails previously released by WikiLeaks have included messages containing the password for Podesta’s iPhone and iPad accounts.

________________

Monterey Bay Forum:   Hilary thought she could  ‘wipe her server clean’.  Looks like she cannot keep those hidden emails hidden from th public after all.

Share

We are all above the law: Fix my new house NOW says Hilary

 

building-permitNo time for permits.  Hilary’s new house must be renovated before Thanksgiving.

Without getting required permits, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton have been renovating a house they bought next to their Chappaqua residence  This is  according to building department records.

Hilary wants the house pool ready before Thanksgiving.  But thepool had   been back-filled.  No time for permits.    What is known:   An in-ground swimming pool at 33 Old House Lane — the 3,631-square-foot, ranch-style house the Clintons bought for $1.16 million in August — had been back-filled and covered with gravel, according to an October report from town Building Inspector William Maskiell.

Maskiell, who said he visited the home Oct. 5, after the department received a complaint about excavation done there, said as he headed to the basement to talk to the contractor, he noticed the kitchen, floors and walls appeared to have been recently renovated and new electrical fixtures were being installed in the ceiling. The person who complained was not identified.

Maskiell said he told the contractor that permits were required.

“During conversation I was told that the owners wanted to have all work done and finished by Thanksgiving and were quite adamant about it and what had started as a paint job turned into this,” Maskiell’s Oct. 17 inspection report said.

A Clinton spokesperson did not return requests for comment.

http://www.today.com/home/hillary-bill-clinton-buy-house-next-door-their-current-chappaqua-t103231

______________________

Firenze Sage:   Permits,we don’t need no stinkin permits.

two sets of laws

two sets of laws

 

 

Share

The Clinton Foundation: an In-N-Out Burger that tastes — terrible?

in-and-out-burger-two-meatsIn-N-Out Burgers produces quality hamburgers which taste great at a reasonable cost.  What about The Clinton Foundation?

Think of  The Clinton Foundation akin to an In-n-Out Burger.   The Clinton Foundation rakes in millions of dollars and has lots of hype and publicity attached to it’s “good works”.   But, how does it “taste

Does The Clinton Foundation produce a  quality product at a reasonable cost?  You decide. Here’s a real example that involved The Clinton Foundation, young women and money for leadership.

Clinton's In and Out Berger

Clinton’s In and Out Berger

What if your college daughter won a $25K  prize for women leadership?  Wow!

But what if it cost $26 K for your daughter  to get the money?      That’s a wash, right?   Perhaps good publicity but no money received  to develop her leadership skills.

That’s the way the Clinton Foundation works.  Lots of money comes  in.   And lots of hype about the ‘good works’ they do.   But only peanuts  goes out for real charity. Roughly 5% of the Clinton Foundation money goes for real charity.

Call it what you want  — The Clinton Foundation is not a  real charity.  Very few people are helped.

Bill Clinton received a prize.  He went to the college to receive the prize.  Instead of accepting the prize money Bill Clinton said,

‘ Naw,  you keep the money and start a program in women leadership ‘.  That’s what  Clinton said after receiving $25  K prize money  for the Dole Leadership Prize.

So the college kept the money. But   — the hooker — Clinton billed the college $26 K for travel expenses.   Overall results?  The college did not really “make” any money to use for women leadership.  The Clinton’s made a thousand dollars  and got lots of  good publicity out of the event.

 

Clinton's In and Out Berger

Clinton’s In-N-Out Burger gives low quality

Those Clinton’s know how to make and keep money.  Wow!

Are the Clinton hustlers? You decide.

Since 2014,,  Hilary and Bill  routinely charge $200 – 500 K a speech at many  college campuses.

At Penn State University, the cost to  attend a special  college function with Clinton’s daughter was  $2,700, $1,000 for a photo and $500 for a “conversation”.  Whew.

Lots of money comes in  to the Clinton’s.  Not much money goes out for charity.

And — concerning the Dole Leadership Prize —  The Clinton Foundation donated no real money to develop college women leadership abilities.  In fact, the Clinton’s made money and got good publicity.  So how does this “taste”?

_______________________

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/9/hillary-clinton-campaign-demanded-500-from-college/

The Wall Street Journal, ‘Free’ Clinton Talks Came at a Big Cost, by James Grimaldi, Friday, Oct. 28, 2016

written by Cameron Jackson, Ph.D.

Monerey Bay Forum

127 Jewell Street
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
United States (US)
Phone: 831 688 6002
Fax: 831 688 7717
Email: jaj48@aol.com

 

 

Share

Cry baby, cry for your life! Hilary supports late term abortions.

 

Cry for your life!

Cry for your life!

Cry baby cry!  A good scream might save your life. Watch out for Hilary!

Hilary  is fine with doctor or parent taking your life  — anytime up to birth.   A fetus has no rights says Hilary. You become a baby only at  birth.  So says Hilary.

Hilary OK with abortion

Hilary OK with late term abortion

Maybe, just maybe, a piercing scream for life might save your life.

Asked about abortion during the third debate,   Hilary wants no government regulations to regulate abortion.

Isn’t that odd?  The government regulates so much.

Look what the government already regulates:  after birth a baby is required by government to  have eye drops to prevent disease.

government required

government required immunizations at birth

 

Government requires car seats for babies to leave hospital

Government requires car seats for babies to leave hospital

The government requires that to leave the hospital a baby must ride in a car seat  — in the back seat.

Later — the government regulates helmets for children riding bikes.

govt requires helmets

govt requires helmets

And no soda sold close to a school.  Heaven forbid!

Where is  baby’s first room?   It’s in Mommy’s womb.

But there are zero protections for baby in Mommy’s womb.

During the third debate Hilary regarding Roe vs Wade Hilary said that the government  must stay out of the decisions women make whether to abort or not to abort.

Laws can be modified.  Perhaps it’s time to modify the law so later term abortions are not legal?  What say you?

Thousands of babies are aborted each year.  Let’s do what we can to prevent unwanted pregnancy.

As a society let’s talk about where to draw the line — when is it OK to abort and when is it not OK to abort?   written by Aptos Psychologist Cameron Jackson

DrCameronJackson@gmail.com 

Monerey Bay Forum

127 Jewell Street
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
United States (US)
Phone: 831 688 6002
Fax: 831 688 7717
Email: jaj48@aol.com

 

Share

Donald Trump versus Hilary regarding freedom September 2018

Freedom

 Will Donald Trump create more freedom for Americans and throughout the world? Or will Hilary Clinton / continuation of Obama do a better job?  As of September, 2018 here’s some freedom links with Trump as President of USA.  There’s more freedom?  Yes!  Lots more freedom!

Freedom  to work :  real wages for workers are rising

Freedom of political speech: confirmation hearings for Supreme Court September 7, 2018

Freedom  to practice ones religion:

Free trade/ no tariffs  with Trump as President

Freedom of ocean travel near China  by Britain, France, USA

What say you?  updated by Cameron Jackson, licensed CA psychologist    drcameronjackson@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

Share

Who will check the checkers? Liberal fact checkers wrong re Trump

Trump and Hilary

Trump and Hilary first debate:  who checks the fact checkers?

So who checks the “fact checkers”?  

Holt: Stop and frisk was ruled unconstitutional in New York…

Trump: No, you’re wrong. It went before a judge, who was a very against-police judge. It was taken away from her and our mayor, our new mayor, refused to go forward with the case.

Fact Wreck rating: Trump is 100% right, according to the New York Times and Holt’s collusion with Clinton is becoming hard to ignore.

Liberal Fact Checkers Get A Nasty Taste Of Truth, Trump’s Right…

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/26/fact-wreck-fact-checking-fact-checkers-first-debate/

_______________________________

Firenze Sage:  The case of the immoderate moderator, again.

Share

Next Page »

Translate »