The moderator asked Clinton why she thinks almost 52 percent of white women voted for Trump, despite them knowing about the controversial “Access Hollywood” tape.
“[Democrats] do not do well with white men and we don’t do well with married, white women,” Clinton explained. “And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should.”
Is Obama the principal person behind the Trump/ Russia collusion story?
Clinton had a simple message why people should elect her — that Trump was “unfit”. Prior to the election that was her message to the American public. That’s about all she had to say. Her message did not sell sufficient for her to win the election.
Within 24 hours of losing the election Hilary Clinton’s campaign put out the message that Trump’s victory was not on the up and up — that he obtained it unfairly due to the Russians. Due to Trump/ Russian involvement in our elections.
What we know now is that Hilary Clinton paid for and created information — none yet collaborated — that Trump supposedly performed unfit behavior. That is what is referred to as the Trump/ Steele dossier aka ‘Golden Showers’.
So first Hillary calls Trump ‘unfit’ and then she pays money and supplies information to create information to supposedly support her contention.
Now the evidence points towards Obama as is the person behind it all. And it appears that Obama’s motive was and is to protect himself.
Remember the basic facts about Obama. He was a Chicago politician. He won his first elections by spreading ‘dirt’ about his opponents. He was a community organizer. He has a law degree and taught constitutional law.
Remember all of Obama’s promises that he did not keep…. such as ‘you can keep your doctor…’
Obama promised the American public that Hilary Clinton would be treated the same as any other American. And then Obama exonerated Hilary Clinton and Obama expected his Justice Dept and FBI to also exonerate Hilary Clinton. Which they did.
The facts keep tumbling out.
What’s especially troubling is that mainstream press, i.e., New York Times and Washington Post prefer to suppress or ignore the story.
Hilary Clinton’s chickens come home to roost? Who really colluded with whom?
Hilary and the Democrat Party colluded to create fake information [the Trump dossier] which — for the past year — has affected many people’s reputations.
For nearly a year, the media has pounded away on the narrative that Trump colluded and stole the election from Hilary.
Hilary Clinton’s campaign message for President was simple and consistent: Trump is not fit to serve.
Now we learn via the Washington Post 10/24/17 that Hilary Clinton ‘knew’ Trump’ was supposedly unfit because she and the Democrat Party paid the bill to create false info about Trump.
Hilary Clinton and the Democratic National Party (DNC) paid $9+ MILLION for Fusion GPS to pay Christopher Steele to create the dossier on Trump.
What is Fusion GPS? hiding? Fusion GPS describes itself as a “research and strategic intelligence firm” founded by “three former Wall Street Journal investigative reporters.” But congressional sources say it’s actually an opposition-research group for Democrats, and the founders, who are more political activists than journalists, have a pro-Hillary Clinton, anti-Trump agenda.
“These weren’t mercenaries or hired guns,” a congressional source familiar with the dossier probe said. “These guys had a vested personal and ideological interest in smearing Trump and boosting Hillary’s chances of winning the White House.”
Dirt digging by Fusion GPS: Fusion GPS was on the payroll of an unidentified Democratic ally of Clinton when it hired long-retired British spy Christopher Steele to dig up dirt on Trump. In 2012, Democrats hired Fusion GPS to uncover dirt on GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney. And in 2015, Democratic ally Planned Parenthood retained Fusion GPS to investigate pro-life activists protesting the abortion group.
Take away: Now we know why Hilary Clinton was so adamant that she ‘knew’ that Trump is unfit to serve. She ‘knows’ because she paid lots of money to create false information on Trump via Fusions GPS.
Next step: Let’s require Fusion GPS to open up it’s books. We may learn a lot more about who colluded with whom when that happens.
Like exactly who profited from the sale of 20 percent of USA uranium to Russia when Hilary Clinton was Secretary of State. Did Hilary collude?
Hoisted by her petard? Hilary — who uses Podesta to injure her opponents — has been ‘injured’ by Podesta — who is Hilary’s campaign manager. Those emails Hilary wanted erased are coming back to haunt her.
Petard: Injured by the devise (person) you intended to use to injure others.
Evidence Shows How Phishing Scammers Hacked Into Clinton Campaign
October 28, 2016 7:48 PM
Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. (David Hume Kennerly/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON (CBS/AP) — New evidence appears to show how hackers earlier this year stole more than 50,000 emails of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, an audacious electronic attack blamed on Russia’s government and one that has resulted in embarrassing political disclosures about Democrats in the final weeks before the U.S. presidential election.
The hackers sent John Podesta an official-looking email on Saturday, March 19, that appeared to come from Google. It warned that someone in Ukraine had obtained Podesta’s personal Gmail password and tried unsuccessfully to log in, and it directed him to a website where he should “change your password immediately.”
Podesta’s chief of staff, Sara Latham, forwarded the email to the operations help desk of Clinton’s campaign, where staffer Charles Delavan in Brooklyn, New York, wrote back 25 minutes later, “This is a legitimate email. John needs to change his password immediately.”
But the email was not authentic.
The link to the website where Podesta was encouraged to change his Gmail password actually directed him instead to a computer in the Netherlands with a web address associated with Tokelau, a territory of New Zealand located in the South Pacific. The hackers carefully disguised the link using a service that shortens lengthy online addresses. But even for anyone checking more diligently, the address — “google.com-securitysettingpage” — was crafted to appear genuine.
In the email, the hackers even provided an Internet address of the purported Ukrainian hacker that actually traced to a mobile communications provider in Ukraine. It was also notable that the hackers struck Podesta on a weekend morning, when organizations typically have fewer resources to investigate and respond to reports of such problems. Delavan, the campaign help-desk staffer, did not respond immediately to the AP’s questions about his actions that day.
It is not immediately clear how Podesta responded to the threat, but five months later hackers successfully downloaded tens of thousands of emails from Podesta’s accounts that have now been posted online. The Clinton campaign declined to discuss the incident. Podesta has previously confirmed his emails were hacked and said the FBI was investigating.
The suspicious email was among more than 1,400 messages published by WikiLeaks on Friday that had been hacked from Podesta’s account.
It was not known whether the hackers deliberately left behind the evidence of their attempted break-in for WikiLeaks to reveal, but the tools they were using seven months ago still indicate they were personally targeting Podesta: Late Friday, the computer in the Netherlands that had been used in the hacking attempt featured a copy of Podesta’s biographical page from Wikipedia.
The U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Homeland Security Department have formally accused Russian state-sponsored hackers for the recent string of cyberattacks intended to influence the presidential election.
The help-desk staffer, Delevan, emailed to Podesta’s chief of staff a separate, authentic link to reset Podesta’s Gmail password and encouraged Podesta to turn on two-factor authentication. That feature protects an account by requiring a second code that is separately sent to a cell phone or alternate email address before a user can log in. “It is absolutely imperative that this is done ASAP,” Delevan said.
Tod Beardsley, a security research manager at the Boston-based cybersecurity firm Rapid7, said the fact that an IT person deemed the suspicious email to be legitimate “pretty much guarantees the user who is not an IT person is going to click on it.”
Other emails previously released by WikiLeaks have included messages containing the password for Podesta’s iPhone and iPad accounts.
Monterey Bay Forum: Hilary thought she could ‘wipe her server clean’. Looks like she cannot keep those hidden emails hidden from th public after all.
No time for permits. Hilary’s new house must be renovated before Thanksgiving.
Without getting required permits, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton have been renovating a house they bought next to their Chappaqua residence This is according to building department records.
Hilary wants the house pool ready before Thanksgiving. But thepool had been back-filled. No time for permits. What is known: An in-ground swimming pool at 33 Old House Lane — the 3,631-square-foot, ranch-style house the Clintons bought for $1.16 million in August — had been back-filled and covered with gravel, according to an October report from town Building Inspector William Maskiell.
Maskiell, who said he visited the home Oct. 5, after the department received a complaint about excavation done there, said as he headed to the basement to talk to the contractor, he noticed the kitchen, floors and walls appeared to have been recently renovated and new electrical fixtures were being installed in the ceiling. The person who complained was not identified.
Maskiell said he told the contractor that permits were required.
“During conversation I was told that the owners wanted to have all work done and finished by Thanksgiving and were quite adamant about it and what had started as a paint job turned into this,” Maskiell’s Oct. 17 inspection report said.
A Clinton spokesperson did not return requests for comment.
Think of The Clinton Foundation akin to an In-n-Out Burger. The Clinton Foundation rakes in millions of dollars and has lots of hype and publicity attached to it’s “good works”. But, how does it “taste”
Does The Clinton Foundation produce a quality product at a reasonable cost? You decide. Here’s a real example that involved The Clinton Foundation, young women and money for leadership.
What if your college daughter won a $25K prize for women leadership? Wow!
But what if it cost $26 K for your daughter to get the money? That’s a wash, right? Perhaps good publicity but no money received to develop her leadership skills.
That’s the way the Clinton Foundation works. Lots of money comes in. And lots of hype about the ‘good works’ they do. But only peanuts goes out for real charity. Roughly 5% of the Clinton Foundation money goes for real charity.
Call it what you want — The Clinton Foundation is not a real charity. Very few people are helped.
Bill Clinton received a prize. He went to the college to receive the prize. Instead of accepting the prize money Bill Clinton said,
‘ Naw, you keep the money and start a program in women leadership ‘. That’s what Clinton said after receiving $25 K prize money for the Dole Leadership Prize.
So the college kept the money. But — the hooker — Clinton billed the college $26 K for travel expenses. Overall results? The college did not really “make” any money to use for women leadership. The Clinton’s made a thousand dollars and got lots of good publicity out of the event.
Those Clinton’s know how to make and keep money. Wow!
Are the Clinton hustlers? You decide.
Since 2014,, Hilary and Bill routinely charge $200 – 500 K a speech at many college campuses.
At Penn State University, the cost to attend a special college function with Clinton’s daughter was $2,700, $1,000 for a photo and $500 for a “conversation”. Whew.
Lots of money comes in to the Clinton’s. Not much money goes out for charity.
And — concerning the Dole Leadership Prize — The Clinton Foundation donated no real money to develop college women leadership abilities. In fact, the Clinton’s made money and got good publicity. So how does this “taste”?
Will Donald Trump create more freedom for Americans and throughout the world? Or will Hilary Clinton / continuation of Obama do a better job? As of September, 2018 here’s some freedom links with Trump as President of USA. There’s more freedom? Yes! Lots more freedom!